“Anna has the cooties, pass it on” the note said.
Except in this case the scrawled message inside the folded piece of paper wasn’t written by some third-grader but by three grown-ups. Three straight, white, male ordained elders in the United Methodist Church, to be exact. And the note got passed to the bishop.
With all the casual meanness of schoolyard bullies, these three men of privilege in our church responded to Anna Blaedel’s courageous and moving coming-out speech on the floor of the Iowa annual conference by telling on her for being gay.
They could not be bothered to date their note, fully punctuate it, or to properly cite what paragraph of Holy Book of Discipline That is More Important to Follow than Jesus’s Commandment to Love Your Neighbor Anna was violating. Nah, who needs that? Everyone knows gay people have the cooties. They couldn’t even bother to type their complaint, or spell her name correctly.
That this two-minute effort (if you can call it that – it might be stretching the definition of the term) could result in the loss of Anna’s livelihood, strip her of her credentials, and end her career is not incidental to this story, but rather central to it. So is the fact that the bishop thought that this output was sufficient enough to initiate a formal process against Anna. He wrote the letter officially notifying her of the complaint process the day after the Orlando massacre. The day after.
If the bishop saw any connection between queer people being brought up on church charges as “incompatible with Christian teaching” for who they and queer people being mowed down in a nightclub for who they are, it wasn’t enough to give him pause.
But as Anna observed, “people do not begin to learn to hate from hate groups, but from more subtle statements and conventional practices, like those found within our own Book of Discipline, and shared from our own United Methodist pulpits.”
And before anyone utters the words “breaking the covenant” to justify what Revs. Peters, Hoyt, and Blanchard and Bishop Trimble are doing to Anna, let me remind everyone that covenants are about relationships built on mutuality. They imply that the parties to the covenant have some level of respect for one another. What we have here is four men, two of whom have never even met Anna, who with the flick of a pen are willing ruin her career and jeopardize her economic survival. There is nothing remotely respectful in that, no hint of mutuality, and certainly no clue that they absorbed Jesus’s admonition “just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.”
No, this is a raw exercise of power. Conservatives in our denomination have church law on their side; and with their threats, votes, complaints, charges, and trials, they have made it perfectly clear that they are bringing the full force of institutional power against LGBTQI people (as well as the straight allies who dare to minister to us). Outside of Methodist-speak, this behavior would be described as repression. Instead, we are bamboozled by the preposterous claim that it is about “keeping covenant.” Please.
But the powerless in any relationship are rarely without some power that they can exercise in their effort to survive and resist. We do not have the law on our side, nor the church’s judicial system, which has consistently upheld unjust laws, nor our executive branch, the Council of Bishops. But we do have the power of our compliance with the system, and we can and increasingly have withdrawn that.
In the last two weeks, three annual conferences have voted to outright defy the Discipline’s discriminatory laws, and another two have urged their leaderships to refuse compliance. These “acts of non-conformity” follow the amazing and powerful witness of queer clergy coming out this spring, the declarations of five boards of ordained ministry that they will not discriminate against LGBTQI candidates, and years of organized networks of clergy offering weddings to same-sex couples.
We are not powerless. Our power lies in our refusal to be complicit in The UMC’s bigotry and our ability to live into a new way of being church.
For the rest of the church, it’s time to decide: Which side are you on? The bullies? Or the bullied?
Dr. Dorothee Benz
Latest posts by Dr. Dorothee Benz (see all)
- On bishops, choices, and the prompting of the Holy Spirit - November 8, 2016
- Statement read to the Council of Bishops - November 1, 2016
- Same old same old - October 7, 2016
The more I learn about the political processes of the UMC the more troubled I become. This note looks like the kind of note that would have been passed around in elementary school by the class bullies. The elementary school teacher would have dealt with it accordingly by snatching it away and ripping it up in front of the class to show the bullies that there is no place for this in a civilized society.
I am relatively new to the UMC so the General Conference 2016 was the first one I followed. I find it puzzling that an organization with thousands of employees in the US doesn’t find it necessary to comply with labor and employment laws. In Iowa, where Rev. Blaedel is employed, Iowa law protects employees from discrimination based on their gender identity, sexual orientation, etc. In our own UMC documents I find the following. “Scripture also teaches that an economic system should be ordered so that employees receive justice at their place of work and that concern for right relationships among people and with all of creation should be the heart of any economic system. Society and its institutions (isn’t the UMC an institution) are to be structured so that marginalized persons participate fully in the shaping of society and their own future.” (Found at http://www.umc.org/what-we-believe/rights of workers).
How is the UMC following our own social principles when we treat our employees so disrespectfully?
ps They didn’t even spell her name correctly!
This is heartbreaking in its meanness and smugness. It reeks of the “good ole boy’s club.” Real MEN are not so callous. Their arrogance does not bode well for them or for our church.
Thank you, Bobbie, for your reminding us of civil law and comments in scripture. The UMC is not like the Methodist Episcopl Church I grew up in over 80 years ago, nor like the Evangelical United Brethren Church a few blocks down the street. This was during WWII, and the US govt. wanted every man they could get into service. So they took the young gay man who returned to church every time he was home on leave, wearing his navy white uniform…and he played the organ~~accepted by both church and government. May God continue to bless Rev. Anna Blaedel. And may Holy Spirit get through to our Bishop.
Let’s be quite careful. Her sacrifice puts a face to an issue where folks on both sides too-easily view the opposition as an inhuman, foolish, unfeeling mob.
While I disagree with the impulse that had these three write their note, describing it as “she has cooties”, I feel, cheapens her sacrifice.
To ignore that the “opposition” is just as honest in their convictions as we are in ours would make us criminally negligent in our duty to act toward others (ALL others) in Christian love. It is also a disservice to those caught in the middle.
We will successfully navigate this storm only if we all address each other as fellow, beloved children of Christ. Each of us with as sincere a faith as the ‘other’.
This breaks my heart. We were told to love each other. How is this a loving action?
send this to Ellen DeGeneres get the word out ..she has a huge audience all over the world!
I made my decision in 1979 when I answered “Yes” to the questions the bishop asked me. I choose to abide by my decision.
Bobbie McCardle, pastors are not “employees”. Rather, they are called by God and the church to positions of the highest responsibility; and are called to live according to the values and standards of the church.